Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mr. Prickly™'s avatar

What struck me most in your reading, Rebekah, was that inversion of the Victorian “bad childhood” redemption arc. Gorey takes the sentimental scaffolding of A Little Princess and The Water Babies and hollow points it, removing divine consolation so only aesthetic cruelty remains. Your connection to L’enfant de Paris deepens that: the melodrama becomes almost self-aware of its own excess, a parody that punishes empathy.

I’m intrigued by your reading of the winged demons as passive witnesses rather than active corrupters. Could they also function as a grotesque mirror for the Victorian “omniscient narrator” ever-watching, morally certain, yet powerless to intervene? It would make Gorey’s satire extend beyond class or religion into the act of storytelling itself.

What do you think? Are those demons a visual stand-in for the narrator’s eye, or for ours?

Expand full comment
Sheila (of Ephemera)'s avatar

Oh, the sofa! I’m excited to see what you think! I always found The Hapless Child too unrelentingly cruel. Nice catch on the demons in the background, Rebekah!

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts